I’m going to be accused of click bait, I know it...
I suppose
it’s the perceived duty of all published writers to play Grand Inquisitor (I
really mean commentator) on public behavior in such a way that doesn’t specifically
address a hot-button topic, but calls to question our interpretation of the
topic so as to create an air of uncertainty. Given the date of original
publication to the Gainesville Times — Tuesday, December 27, 1988 — I imagine
this might have something to do with 1988’s presidential election and the
serious rhetoric surrounding it, namely the Iran-Contra affair and its
prosecution. Ethics, morality, and the common good. All perception, right? More
after the column…
Can’t relate to the dead horse lotto? Here’s an actual morality
tale that occurred just a few months ago:
A sparkling new local fast food establishment held their
Grand Opening this past June. A couple weeks later, someone (me) noticed that
this restaurant was charging the wrong sales tax rate — 8% instead of 6%. Since
my overage amounted to a few cents, and the drive-thru was busy, I let it go. No
biggie; they’ll sort it soon enough. I wouldn’t return until they did. A week
later, a local social network was abuzz with queries regarding the tax overage.
The restaurant’s management was alerted. They said they were aware of it, blaming
their sales systems and corporate management. A hot debate ensued. Comments
varied from accusations of mob lynching, absurd vigilantism, “Just think of all
those employees you want to put out of work!”, “It’s just a few cents! You can’t
afford it?!?”, tax codes broken, jail, mathematical computations of the
three-week haul (it is significant, mind you), but mostly, “It’s just a mistake
and they will fix it.”
Thing is, they didn’t until news of the online firestorm
reached a local county commissioner. The rate quickly changed to the correct 6%.
So, what happened to the ill-gotten tax dollars? (Estimated somewhere between
$1000-$1800) Nobody seems to care.
For me, as soon as management was aware they were
overcharging and continued to do so, they were violating law, ethics, and of
course, morality— the other F-word… fraud. That’s from my perspective, a pickpocketing
for extra change as it may be. From other customers’ perspectives, it wasn't a
big enough issue to worry about because of the workers needs and the personal needs
for that new restaurant outweighed the few cents out of their pocket. From the
restaurant’s perspective, it wasn’t important to correct the issue quickly so
long as no business was lost and nobody important made inquiry. Unfortunately,
this seems to be a standard practice for certain upstarts who possess a playbook
for deviant gains.
Oh, and speaking of whistleblowers, Facebook's latest appears to be leading a morality charge that also seeks to define and generalize what the company considers misinformation, which much of it is, while commingling/mislabeling truthful information that happens to disagree with its preferred narrative of "the truth". Today's filtering has become quite complicated, indeed!